As ordinary citizens are encouraged to take part in the political life of the country, they have the power to directly influence the outcome of government policies through the democratic procedures of voting, campaigning and the use of press. Essentially this means that a democratic government may not be providing the most good for the largest number of people. However, some have argued that this should not even be the goal of democracies because the minority could be seriously mistreated under that purported goal. Madison, "Federalist 63," in The Federalist Papersp.
Does congress still believe in a Constitutional Republic form of Government? The decline of America as a constitutional republic of America as a constitutional republic and its rebirth as a corporate republic.
Corporatocracy or Corpocracy is a form of government where a corporation, a group of corporations, or government entities with private components, control the direction and governance of a country. If this sounds familiar, it should because this is exactly how our current government is being governed.
This form of government is also known as a Corporate Republic form of government Independent Agencies and Government Corporations. These agencies are responsible for keeping the government and economy running smoothly. They, congress, Democracy good or bad nothing less than create a harbinger of a new, creative management era where the purported artificial barriers between the government and private sector can be breached as a matter of principle rather than by law.
The Attorney General has stated. Agencies have no inherent lawmaking powers. They are not creatures of the Constitution…. Addressed by Attorney General Edward Meese.
Sept 13, The following pertains quasi governmental agencies created by congress. The scope and consequences of these hybrid organizations have not been extensively studied. Basic definitional issues resist resolution.
Even the language to be used in discussing the quasi government is in dispute. Should government management be discussed in the language of law, economic theory, or the business school?
The belief that management flexibility requires entity-specific laws and regulations, even at the cost of less accountability to representative institutions.
Privatization moves components of the provision of goods and services out of the governmental sector and into the private sector.
These two sectors are not identical. As the National Academy of Public Administration noted, In point of fact, there are some fundamental differences between the [governmental and private sectors] …. Accountability Government agencies, unlike private firms, usually operate under complex accountability hierarchies that include multiple and even conflicting goals.
Federal agencies, for example, are subject to the corpus of federal management laws. The framers of the Constitution prohibited the federal government from delegating legislative power from the duly elected representatives of Congress to any other entity. They warned that if legislative power were combined with executive power, or if legislative power were combined with judicial power, our republic would become an oligarchy and the rights of the people would be sacrificed to achieve the the selfish ends of those who govern.
It would keep abuse of power in check by humbling those in government with the need to to satisfy the dictates of competing power centers. While retaining some semblance of republican government, a corporate republic would be run primarily like a business, involving a board of directors and executives.
Utilities, including hospitals, schools, the army, and the police force, would be privatized… Although corporate republics do not exist officially in the modern world, they are often used in works of fiction or political commentary as a warning of the perceived dangers of unbridled capitalism.
Wall Street cannot and should not have it both ways. It should be noted that crony capitalism Unbridled capitalism should not be confused with true capitalism. Crony capitalists make their living by controlling the free market place for their own benefit.
True capitalists make their living by working with the free market place instead of trying to controlling it. Personally, I do not have not problem with true capitalists who make a profit from their investments in the free market place.CHAPTER 4: BOTSWANA’S SUCCESS: GOOD GOVERNANCE, GOOD POLICIES, AND GOOD LUCK 83 The counterintuitive notion that the endowment of nat .
Criticism of democracy is grounded in democracy's contested definition—its purpose, process, and outcomes.
Since Classical antiquity and through the modern era, democracy has been associated with "rule of the people," "rule of the majority," and free selection or election either through direct participation or elected representation respectively, but has not been linked to a particular outcome.
FairVote is a nonpartisan champion of electoral reforms that give voters greater choice, a stronger voice, and a representative democracy that works for all Americans.
Across the world, a median of 78% say representative democracy is a good way to govern their country. Yet, pro-democracy views coexist with openness to nondemocratic forms of governance. An Important Distinction: Democracy versus Republic.
It is important to keep in mind the difference between a Democracy and a Republic, as dissimilar forms of government. Understanding the difference is essential to comprehension of the fundamentals involved.
Is capitalism bad? The main argument that says capitalism is bad goes like this: people need to be controlled or the greedy and the powerful will use the good hard-working people of the earth and destroy the earth while they are at it.